February 6th, 2018
As more and more Pakis flood into the country, and as the ones who are already here breed their spawn, more and more of our women get raped.
That is a plain fact. There is no grey area or obscure reasoning or nuance to be appreciated and understood here. There’s just the simple fact that Pakis come in and rapes go up.
If you want to make the case “well, not all the Pakis are rapists”, then you have to ask yourself, “would that be a valid line of reasoning if every Paki except one was a rapist”? Would you still be able to say “well not all of them are like that” even though 999,999 out of every 1 million was literally going out and raping girls?
Obviously, that would be a stupid argument to make. It’s like saying “sometimes cancer doesn’t kill you so we shouldn’t be worried about getting cancer”.
But why would you not use the argument? It is still technically true! The point is that you would recognise that it is a dishonest argument, even though technically true. It doesn’t get you anywhere. In that scenario pointing out the one paki who doesn’t rape doesn’t help you deal with the fact that he is outnumbered 999,999-to-1 by rapists.
As you can see, not all of these men are carrying weapons. Therefore you can safely walk through the crowd, and we can ignore the fact that most of them have weapons.
What percentage of Pakis are, in the real world, rapists, is not really easy to say.
It may be 20%, it may be 50%, it may be just 5%.
But the question remains: how does pointing out that a certain amount of Pakis don’t rape, help us deal with the fact that a certain amount of them do rape?
Obviously, it doesn’t. It’s just a dishonest argument put forward by people who would rather let English girls be raped than be called racist.
Two teenagers acted as a “twisted tag team”, raping a woman at her home, behind a mosque and in an alleyway at gunpoint in what police called a “disgusting, heartless attack”.
In March last year Aquib Ahmed and a 16-year-old who cannot be named for legal reasons broke into the Sheffield home of a man and his daughter, looking for drugs and threatening them with a handgun.
After realising they had targeted the ‘wrong’ house, as its occupants had no drugs or criminal connections and leaving, South Yorkshire Police said the pair returned to the three days later “purely for their own sexual gratification, where they threatened the man and his daughter at gunpoint before they each raped the young woman repeatedly.”
Sheffield Crown Court heard how the young woman and her father were at home when there was a knock at one of the windows in the early hours of April 1 before Ahmed burst into the property.
Jason Pitter QC said the defendant, then aged 18, pointed a gun at the victim’s father, ordering him to go to his bedroom. After he complied, Ahmed held a gun to the woman’s forehead and raped her.
Judge Peter Kelson QC said: “After she was raped by you, you then, effectively, marched her to your co-defendant who was waiting behind the mosque.”
This is England now. Yes, it’s pretty bad. But is it as bad as an England without gang-raping curry-merchants? It’s a small price to pay for the benefits, which include kebab, amongst many other things.
As tis 16 year old was being raped by these aliens, she must’ve thought “yeah but the curry tho…”
The Sheffield Star reports that Ahmed then left the scene, and his co-accused proceeded to rape the woman behind the mosque before taking her to an alleyway next to a nearby takeaway, where he raped her again.
So she could be reminded of the benefits of curry and kebab and not put up a fuss, presumably.
“When he was finished with her, he told her to walk home … however her ordeal was not yet concluded, Ahmed was at her home waiting for her,” Mr Pitter told the court.
Ahmed then raped the woman again, and before leaving, told her: “Don’t tell the police, because if you do, we will be back to blow your heads off.”
Sheffield Crown Court heard the traumatic attack led to the victim suffering from anxiety and depression, quitting her job and moving house, in a victim impact statement where she explained the attack left her unable to trust men and ruined her relationship with her father.
“I don’t feel there’s a place for in this world anymore, I don’t feel there’s a place for me anywhere,” the young woman said, adding: “I feel like my whole life will be affected by this ordeal.
“I will try my hardest to move on, but I will never forget what those two monsters did to me.”
This woman should have been in the spring of life, ready to meet a man and produce healthy children, and feel the deepest happiness a woman can feel.
Instead, she will be damaged forever because of what these people did to her. And here’s the eternal question; WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY HERE?!
Sentencing Ahmed, Judge Kelson explained he treated cautions on the defendant’s record — which include sexual assault, and threats to kidnap and rape a young girl — as aggravating factors.
However, he sentenced the rapist to only 15 years, with another 5 years on license. He may not serve the full 15 years behind bars, either, as it is standard practice to release criminals from custody automatically halfway through their prison terms in most cases — meaning Ahmed could be free in seven years or less.
(This is what happened in the case of child groomer Mubarek Ali, who was sentenced to 14 years with a further eight years in licence, in theory, but released after only five.)
Ahmed’s unnamed co-rapist was sentenced to only six years, meaning who could potentially be released in three years or less, when he will not even be out of his teens.
The Sheffield Star applied to at least lift the reporting restrictions on the 16-year-old’s identity, given the seriousness of his crime and the potentially grave threat he could pose to the public, but Judge Kelson refused.
South Yorkshire Police seemed ecstatic with the sentences, however, announcing somewhat misleadingly that the teens had been sentenced to “over 25 years” — combined, inclusive of time which will not actually be spent in custody — and crowing “What a result!”
When pressed, Detective Superintendent Una Jenning would not say whether she would appeal to the Attorney-General’s Office to appeal for longer terms under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme — it seems unlikely — although any member of the public who feels the sentences are inadequate can do so online.
New sentencing guidelines brought in last year instruct judges to treat young offenders from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds more leniently than white criminals, urging courts to take into account “discrimination and negative experiences of authority” they might have suffered.
Having set up a Race Disparity Unit, the Tory government has promised to be “world-leading” in tackling disparities in outcome between white people and people from BME groups in the criminal justice system.
But figures recently revealed in the first detailed ethnic breakdown of youth violence suggests it has an uphill task in closing the gap, as they showed that 55 per cent of 260 suspects in fatal stabbings were black men, while just 11 per cent were white — despite the fact that black people are 3 per cent of the population, according to the 2011 census.
So the official stance of the government is that even if 100% of these mongrels were rapists, we still have to carry on because for some reason which no one can explain we have to achieve diversity which means you destroy yourselves and let these creatures replace you and take your loved ones as sex slaves.
Why do we have to do this?
Because Jews. Because to not allow every single English girl to be raped would be like another holocaust or something. We have to do it because the only other option is racism and the Jews told us that that is the worst evil of all.